[Application of infrared thermography technique to assist peroneal artery perforator flap in the repair of oral and maxillofacial defects].

Objective: To explore the application value of infrared thermography (IRT) technique assisted peroneal artery perforator flap in repairing oral and maxillofacial defects. Methods: The clinical data of 20 patients with oral and maxillofacial malignant tumors treated with peroneal artery perforator flap between October 2020 and December 2021 were retrospectively analysed. There were 13 males and 7 females, with an average age of 56.5 years (range, 32-76 years). There were 8 cases of tongue cancer, 5 cases of parotid gland cancer, 4 cases of buccal cancer, and 3 cases of mandibular gingival cancer; and 12 cases of squamous cell carcinoma, 3 cases of adenoid cystic carcinoma, and 5 cases of mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Color Doppler ultrasound (CDU) and IRT technique were performed before operation to locate the peroneal artery perforator and assist in the design of the flap. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CDU and IRT technique were compared with the actual exploration during operation. The accuracy of CDU and IRT technique in detecting the number of peroneal artery perforator and the most viable perforating points was compared. The patients were followed up regularly to observe the recovery of donor and recipient sites, the occurrence of complications, and the recurrence and metastasis of tumors. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of peroneal artery perforators detected by IRT technique before operation were 72.22%, 50.00%, 92.86%, and 16.67% respectively, which were higher than those by CDU (64.17%, 33.33%, 84.62%, and 14.29% respectively). Forty-five peroneal artery perforators were found by CDU before operation, and 35 were confirmed during operation, with an accuracy rate of 77.8%; 43 "hot spots" were found by IRT technique, and 32 peroneal artery perforators were confirmed within the "hot spots" range during operation, with an accuracy rate of 74.4%; there was no significant difference between the two methods ( χ²=0.096, P=0.757). The accuracy rates of the most viable perforating points found by CDU and IRT technique were 80.95% (17/21) and 94.74% (18/19), respectively, and there was no significant difference between them ( χ²=0.115, P=0.734). The localization errors of CDU and IRT technique were (5.12±2.10) and (4.23±1.87) mm, respectively, and there was no significant difference between them ( t=1.416, P=0.165). All the perforator flaps survived, and the incisions of donor and recipient sites healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 5-18 months, with an average of 11 months. The skin flap was soft and had good blood supply, and the lower limb scar was concealed and the lower limb had good function. No lower limb swelling, pain, numbness, ankle instability, or other complications occurred, and no tumor recurrence and metastasis were found during the follow-up. Conclusion: Compared with the CDU, using the IRT technique to assist the preoperative peroneal artery perforator flap design to repair the oral and maxillofacial defects has a high clinical application value.

[Clinical analysis of oral and oropharyngeal cancer resection through oral approach].

Objective:To investigate the treatment effect of oral and oropharyngeal cancer resection through oral approach. Methods:Forty-eight patients who with oral and oropharyngeal cancer were admitted to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College from January 2015 to January 2018, and all received preoperative chemotherapy, surgical treatment and postoperative radiotherapy. Among them, twenty-four patients who were treated with tumor resection through oral approach in the experimental group, the other twenty-four patients were treated with tumor resection by external approach in the control group. During the operation, both groups of patients were underwent selective neck lymph node dissection and free skin flap transplantation, and preventive radiotherapy were performed after the operation. The operation time, blood loss, and the positive rate of the wound around the wound and the undercut margin of the two groups were compared, and the survival rate of the skin flap was analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival rate after 3 years of regular follow-up after surgery, and the difference between the curves of the two surgical methods were compared by the Log-rank test, and the quality of life of patients in one year after operation was investigated and analyzed by Washington University students'quality questionnaire 4. Results:The operation time and blood loss of the experimental group were less than the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant（P>0.05）. The positive rate of frozen margins in both groups was 0. The flap survival rate was 95.8% in the experimental group and 91.7% in the control group, there was no significant difference between the two groups（P>0.05）, the overall flap survival rate in the two groups was 93.8%. The survival rates of the experimental group were 91.7%, 83.3%, and 74.8% in the 1-, 2-, and 3-years after surgery, and 87.5%, 79.2%, and 75.0% in the control group, there was no statistically significant difference between the experimental group and the control group（P>0.05）. The 1-year, 2-year and 3-year overall survival rates of the two groups were 93.1%, 83.7% and 78.8% respectively. Compared with the control group, the scores of appearance, activity, recreation, swallowing, chewing, speech and mood in the experimental group were significantly higher（P<0.05）. Conclusion:Resection of oral cancer tumors through the oral approach with free skin flap repair is in line with the concept of minimally invasive surgery, which improves the quality of life of patients after surgery while ensuring the survival rate, and is worthy of clinical application and promotion.